...maybe strapping would help?
Oct. 22nd, 2008 06:11 pmExams went well enough, save for the part when they were both on the same day, which required about six hours of handwriting. The only things that really threw me were worth about two marks, so if that's the worst of it, I'm fine.
Think it's time to take more painkillers and maybe some anti-inflamatories. Wrist still aches, all the way up to the elbow. Don't want to type for too long, handwriting would be a bad idea and doing crossstitch wouldn't be particularly bright of me.
I might go make dinner so we can eat early. Apparently a lawyer from my work is on Fair Go tonight - something about "a tricky repossession story where the new owners of a house have been told the garage will have to be ripped up because there's money owing on it to a finance company. Fair Go asks who is at fault and who will pay."
I would have thought that a garage is a fixture and the proceeds of the previous sale of the property should have covered the amount owing - indeed, I would have thought that the finance company would have put a caveat on the title so they could make sure there was an undertaking in place that they would be paid before they issued consent and a transfer could occur. I certainly would have thought that the people the finance company would be going after would be the previous owners of the property.
...I guess I'll be watching it then.
EDIT: Forgot about painkillers, but a change of motion (cooking dinner) made a difference anyway. And the lawyer from work - so backed up exactly what I said and thought. It was blatantly obvious - what was tricky about it? The law is clear and the garage company should totally go after the son for damages.
Think it's time to take more painkillers and maybe some anti-inflamatories. Wrist still aches, all the way up to the elbow. Don't want to type for too long, handwriting would be a bad idea and doing crossstitch wouldn't be particularly bright of me.
I might go make dinner so we can eat early. Apparently a lawyer from my work is on Fair Go tonight - something about "a tricky repossession story where the new owners of a house have been told the garage will have to be ripped up because there's money owing on it to a finance company. Fair Go asks who is at fault and who will pay."
I would have thought that a garage is a fixture and the proceeds of the previous sale of the property should have covered the amount owing - indeed, I would have thought that the finance company would have put a caveat on the title so they could make sure there was an undertaking in place that they would be paid before they issued consent and a transfer could occur. I certainly would have thought that the people the finance company would be going after would be the previous owners of the property.
...I guess I'll be watching it then.
EDIT: Forgot about painkillers, but a change of motion (cooking dinner) made a difference anyway. And the lawyer from work - so backed up exactly what I said and thought. It was blatantly obvious - what was tricky about it? The law is clear and the garage company should totally go after the son for damages.